
Instructor: |
Teaching Assistant: |
|
Frank Krzystofiak Ph.D. |
Nisha Lakshminarayanan |
|
271 Jacobs Management Center |
275 Jacobs Management Center |
|
Hours: 2:30 – 3:30 M. & W. |
Hours: |
|
Phone: (716) 645 – 3230 |
Phone: (716) 645 - 5236 |
|
E-mail: fk@buffalo.edu |
E-mail: nl24@buffalo.edu |
|
|
Managerial activity revolves around the
making of decisions. One essential aspect of decision making involves
organizing and evaluating relevant data. Given the amount of data accessible to
today’s managers there is an increasing need to rely on quantitative methods as
a means of extracting significant information and giving it meaning. In this
way, Quantitative Methods means making facts speak clearly by turning facts
into information, so that information can be turned into decisions, and decisions
into results.
Good managerial judgment requires an
understanding of the numbers combined with an appreciation for what the numbers
mean (and what they don't mean!). Managers find simple models and ideas provide powerful and
sometimes surprising qualitative insights about common problems. The course aims to give you a
feeling for the kinds of problems that are amenable to quantitative analysis,
the methods available for performing such analysis, and the difficulties
involved in gathering the relevant data.
Third the course reflects my belief that
managers do more than make decisions; managers communicate to others their
understanding of situations, including the issues to be considered, objectives,
action alternatives, contingencies, and uncertainties. One emphasis of this
course will be placed on: development of abilities to approach problems by
using a systematic, analytical process; implementation of mathematical models
on a computer; understanding of the resulting output; and communication of
relevant information.
Rather than survey all of the techniques I
stress those fundamental concepts and tools that I believe are most important
for the practical analysis of management decisions, presenting the material as
much as possible in the context of realistic business situations from a variety
of settings. The implementation of these tools has been facilitated
considerably by the development of spreadsheet-based software packages, and so
I make liberal use of spreadsheet models. My goal is to enable you to become
intelligent users of quantitative techniques, not experts in statistics or
computer software.
You may find that much of the action in the
course has to do with the mechanics of the formulation and solution of simple
problems. That is not the purpose of the course, but I believe that at time it
is the best way to accomplish course objectives. The simple exercises are
complemented by a case assignment that captures more realistically the
complexity of managerial problems.
Numeracy skills: The ability to reason
logically, especially with numbers, making rough estimates or a
back-of-the-envelope calculation, checking for consistency of units.
Design skills: The skills necessary to
build and use a simple spreadsheet. Basic ability: to identify key data, to
summarize that data, to display results both tabularly and graphically, to
debug a spreadsheet effectively, and to draw useful inferences from the
outputs.
Interpretation skills: Interpretation skills
include the ability to recognize a problem in a complex mess of symptoms,
causes, solutions, and data; the ability to infer patterns and meanings from
data; and the ability to translate these patterns into layman’s language to
communicate clearly to decision makers or employees who will have to implement
proposed changes
1.
2. In general, attendance is voluntary.
3. Side conversations, late arrivals and early departures, reading the newspaper, and the like are disruptive. The role of enforcer is one that I neither desire nor enjoy, so I will count on all of you to uphold and enforce appropriate standards of classroom conduct. Thank You.
4. Pictures and Name Cards: All students will be asked to provide a current photograph. The photograph must look like you and be clear!
5. The lectures are used to present the basic ideas. Although the textbook will be followed fairly closely, it is the students' responsibility to keep informed and current in regard to day-to-day coverage.

◦ Final grades will be based on cumulative points earned in examinations, cases, and evaluations.
◦ Final Examination 25%
◦ Quizzes 30%
◦ Individual Homework 20%
◦ Group Cases/Homework 25%
◦ Peer Evaluations (part of group case homework 25%)
◦ Class Participation (part of individual & group homework 45%)
◦
Six Individual
Homework exercises provide opportunities to practice statistical
analysis introduced in the course. Homework emphasizes the quantitative aspects
of the course material and provides feedback on how well the analytic
techniques are being mastered. Students are encouraged to go over these
assignments in-group. Each of you is expected to seriously attempt each
homework problem individually, and only to use the group to help resolve open
issues. Ultimately, each student is responsible for all the material covered on
the homework.
◦
Homework is to be submitted as an electronic
file (Excel, Word, Power Point, PDF, or RFT) via the U B Learns digital drop
box.
1. Log into U B Learns,
2. Select Tools,
3. Select Digital Drop
box
4. Select Send File Note: if you select Add File the file is uploaded but not sent to the
instructor.)
5. Enter your name,
6. Browse to find and attach your file, and
7.
Click Submit.
◦ Homework Grading Policy:
• Five questions from each homework will be graded
• 1 point: for each of the 5 graded questions that is completed
• 0-3: for each of the 5 graded questions, based on the accuracy of the answer
◦ The lowest completed homework score will be dropped when calculating the total homework score
◦ All homework assignments are due by 9:00 am on the scheduled date. Late work will neither be accepted nor graded if we erroneously accept it.
◦ These assignments will count towards your final grade, and hence you each must submit your own homework solution. Though homework only accounts for 20% of the final grade, it is important to do the assignments for practice. Similar problems are likely to appear in the quizzes and exams.
◦ File Naming convention: Last Name_ Person Number _ Assignment (e.g. Krzystofiak 55559999 H1.xls or Krzystofiak 55559999 H1.doc). Each homework assignment should be headed in the upper left corner with your last name, first name, and student ID number. Homework without proper student identification will be discarded.
Group
Homework provides a
description of practical situations where statistics analysis can play an
important role. The cases provide opportunities to practice translating
situations into problem structures and, in doing so, to adapt the general
concepts of modeling to particular circumstances. The group will submit one
solution.
• The lowest Case score will be dropped when calculating the group case score
• Peer & Instructor evaluations will be used as a multiplier to adjust your individual case score from 0% (yes that is zero 0%) to 110% of the group case score
1.
Case 1: Lanco
Catalogue Sales (Introduction):
2.
Case 2: Rugged
Client Computers (Description & Display): Prepared for his class by
Frank Krzystofiak
3.
Case 3: Rugged
Client Computers: Quality Control (Probability) Prepared for his class
by Frank Krzystofiak
4.
Case 4: Amore Foods,
5.
Case 5: Home Education Inc. (Point Estimation) Ivey School
of Business, University of Western Ontario, # 9A98E045, © 1998, Version 1999.
6.
Case 6: Bamberger’s
Department Store, Ivey School of Business, University of Western
Ontario, # 9A99E006, © 1999, Version 1999.
7.
Case 7: Alfonso’s Department Store, Ivey School of Business,
8.
Case 8: Springbank Drive Ivey School of
Business, University of Western Ontario, # 9B06E006 © 2006, Version 2007.
◦ There will be two quizzes and a cumulative final exam for this class.
◦ All students must use a pen to write midterm and final exams. Use of pencil voids the student's right to request a re-grade of the exam.
◦ The quizzes and exams will be closed book. One 8.5 x 11.5" note sheet will be allowed on the quizzes and two 8.5 x 11" note sheets will be allowed on the final exam. You may use any portable calculator for the quizzes or the exam (so long as it is not capable of wireless communication). Necessary tables and Excel output or data sets required to solve problems will be provided.
◦ Makeup quizzes and examinations will not be given. The only excuses for missing an exam are: a serious illness or a major family crisis. You must provide proof in the form of an official document. A note from a family member is not sufficient. To be clear -- To prove that you are seriously ill, you need to have a note from a physician documenting that you could not take the particular exam. A note from a physician saying that you were seen for a problem is not sufficient. Colds, sinus problems, upset-stomach, slight fever, etc. are not valid reasons for missing an exam. If you miss a quiz or exam and do not have a valid excuse as described above, you will receive a zero.
◦ I do not give extra-credit work (even if you ask).
◦ (Re-grade) Any dispute arising in grading of homework and exams should be submitted in writing. This letter should clearly state the question(s) where you think there has been a grading error and what you think that error is. Note that upon resubmission the entire exam or homework may be re-graded and not just the disputed question.
◦ (Re-grade) No re-grades will be accepted for quizzes and exams written in pencil.
◦ (Re-grade) There is a one-week time limit for submission of disputes for quizzes, exams and homework. The one-week limit starts from the day the homework/exam have been returned in class.
The Course is structured to promote learning by a combination of individual and group efforts. Group interaction is encouraged to enable you to use time efficiently and to improve your understanding of the material. Group collaboration is always encouraged. However, each student is responsible for learning all the material on the assignment.
The group is responsible for allocating group work equitably among its members and for disciplining free riders. Remember, at the end of semester every group member will be required to submit Peer Evaluation forms to indicate the percentage contribution by each group member. The cumulative score of peer evaluation will count toward the final grade.
With respect to exams, group preparation is permissible, but the work during the exam must be done without the help of other students. Conversations with second-year students or alumni about specific assignments or exams before their due-dates are prohibited.
Class participation is evaluated subjectively and will be employed to make marginal adjustments to final grades.
I value attendance, punctuality, familiarity with the required readings, and classroom questions or comments that are relevant and insightful. In general, I evaluate your classroom participation based on the extent to which you contribute to a positive and effective learning environment (for yourself and others). Demonstration of mastery of advanced topics at inappropriate times does not contribute to a positive learning environment! Correcting me, when I am in error, or asking what may appear to be a dumb question, does contribute positively. (Dumb questions are rarely ridiculous. If it is an issue for you, it is likely an issue for many. Asking can keep the class on track.)
In the case of written homework assignments, your assignment must represent your own individual work. Although you may discuss homework problems with other students, assignments must represent your own work. It may be confusing to draw a line between individual and group work when groups are allowed to "discuss" problems. For this course, groups may discuss the overall nature of a problem, the various ways to approach each problem, and talk through strategies for solving a problem. Groups are not permitted to work at solving the problem, i.e., they may not start building spreadsheets, analyzing data, and producing results. Those activities must be done individually.
Copying or otherwise using the work of other students on an assignment constitutes a violation of the Policy on Individual Work. Copying or otherwise using any other outside materials on an assignment (including last year's solutions of homework assignments and cases) constitutes a violation of the Policy on Individual Work. Any student who copies or knowingly allows his/her work to be copied or who uses outside materials in the preparation of assignments will receive an 0 grade for the assignment.
All students should familiarize themselves with the School's Code of Ethics and Standards of Academic Integrity (MBA Handbook). Unless otherwise specified, cases, papers, and examinations are to be your work and only your work. In other words, you are to be the sole creator of that work (it is to be developed without the assistance of other individuals and without the aid of cases, papers, and examinations from prior semesters). If you are in doubt about the information sources and/or support that may be used, please ask!
1. Cheating. Obtaining information from
another student or other unauthorized source, or giving information to another
student, in connection with an examination or assignment
2. Plagiarism. Copying material from a source or sources and submitting this material as one's own without acknowledging, through specific footnoting and quotation marks, the particular debt to the source
3. Falsification of Academic Materials. Fabricating data or other information, forging an instructor's name or initials for any purpose, changing entries in an instructor's record or official University records, taking an examination under another student's name or engaging any person to take an examination under your name, or submitting an assignment of any kind, prepared in whole or part, by any person other than the person responsible for the assignment.
4. Failing to Fulfill Teamwork Requirements. MBA students are expected to contribute as
full members of study teams. Failing to meet commonly accepted team standards
includes but is not limited to: not attending team meetings, not completing a
fair share of team assignments, and not valuing the contributions of all team
members.
Group Homework provides a description of practical situations where statistics analysis can play a role. For each case your deliverables will include hardcopy submission of a PowerPoint presentation (handout view) along with Electronic Submission of the PowerPoint presentation and an associated Excel file containing relevant analysis.
PowerPoint should address the following (Don’t answer the questions that I have suggested, rather use the question to guide preparation of a business presentation)
· Introduction (What is the purpose of the presentation? Why are making it?)
· Objective / Question (What is / are the issue (s) or Question (s) ?)
· Analytical setup (What is the nature of the sample, data, etc.? If there are any key assumptions this might be the place to point them out.)
· Analysis (What are your key findings?)
· Interpretations / Implications (What does it mean?)
· Conclusion (Your recommendations? Any limitations)
The Excel file should contain the backup detail of your analysis
· The data
· Analytical calculations and results
· Calculations for interpretations
About cases, I am
frequently asked a question along the following lines, “Why did we only get a B
or B- on this case? After all, we answered the question!” My answer tends to
make a distinction between homework assignments and cases. In homework
assignments there is invariably a correct answer, and the grading
considerations are only that you found the correct answer and used an
appropriate method to get it. In cases the answers are not merely right or
wrong. Rather, they can be arrayed along a better to worse continuum in terms
of the extent to which they would add value to the organization. Better cases tend to push the
interpretations, implications, and conclusions to find ways to add value to the
organization in question. Worse cases tend to do little more than
answer the question.
1. What is the returns problem? Identify possible source (s) of the problem. Assemble and present the evidence relating your source (s) to order returns.
2. What assumption have you made in your analysis?
3. What options could / should be considered to rectify the problem.
4. Make recommendations to Lanco’s directors on how to deal with the “product returns” issue. Support your recommendations.
Don’t worry about coming up with the single best answer! As far as I am concerned, there probably isn’t a best answer (although there are many bad answers). Make a reasonable set of assumptions and analyze accordingly. From your analysis, make a decision or recommendation. If you need assistance feel free to ask any question that you have and / or use me as a consultant.
The point of this exercise is to link your data analysis and presentation to managerial decision making. Developing analysis and presentation skills will make the models that you build useful. We build models in order to facilitate evidence based decision making.
Start with Rugged_Computer.xls (completed model with Scenarios). Develop tables and/or charts that summarize the results of the model. The focus should be to assist in selection of an optimal entry price for the computers. Again this involves two tasks: analysis of the data preparation of a graphical exhibit that communicate.
Through analysis and presentation you market the results or products of your efforts. As a manager you gather information and build models to facilitate evidence based decision making.
An essential analytic
task in making decisions based on evidence is to understand how things work –
mechanism, trade - offs, process and dynamics, cause and effect. That is,
intervention - thinking and policy - thinking demand causality - thinking.
Making decisions
based on evidence requires the appropriate display of that evidence. Good display
of data helps to reveal knowledge relevant to understanding mechanism, process
and dynamics, cause and effect. That is, display of statistical data should
directly serve the analytic task at hand. (Tufte, 1997)
Tufte’s point is simple: just because something is reasonable or obvious in theory, just because is clear in the data, doesn’t mean that it will implemented in the actual practice of assessing the data and making decisions.
1. Under the assumption that component failures are independent, prepare an analysis to explain who is correct and what the proper order of testing is.
a. Does order really matter?
b. What determines the proper order, cost, the probability of failure, both, or neither?
2. Should Rachel just send all of the systems to rework?
a. It currently cost $50.00 to send a system to rework. Rachel Mel the founder of Rugged Client computers believes that that this could be brought down to $36.00 or perhaps even $35.50 if all systems were sent to rework.
b. On the plus side this would save the $19.50 that is costs to test every certified system as well as $50.00 rework plus some or all of the $19.50 for any system that experiences a failure for 1 or more components.
3. Based on the 100 system tested does it seem as though component failures are independent?
4. The Data file Rugged Sample of 2500.xls contains complete test results for 2500 system builds. Are component failures independent? What implications does this have for the optimal testing procedure?
1. If the fill target is lowered to 8.22 ounces, how many 20-minute batches will fail to meet the FDA-approved standard because the five sample pies average less than 8 ounces per pie?
2. Prepare a recommendation to Mr. Jenkins regarding lowering the target to 8.22 ounces.
Analysis: The following assumptions may be made to facilitate your analysis.
◦ The mechanical filler fills to target with a standard deviation of 0.22 ounces.
◦ The five sample pies’ weights are independent.
◦ The production rate is 1,000 dozen every 20 minutes.
◦ The monthly production is 60 20-minute batches, or 60,000 dozen pies. Yearly production is 720 batches.
◦ Rejected batches are first sold at the Thrift Store and then donated to charity once the Thrift Store demand has been filled.
◦ The Thrift Store demand is 240 dozen (4 X 60) per month.
1. What financial reserve should be set aside for TV kits?
2. After presenting your estimates to the auditors, you are surprised to find that the auditors don’t think the estimate is accurate enough. In particular, the auditors insist that the financial reserve be within $10,000 of the actual liability.
a. What sample would be required to provide this level of accuracy?
b. What do you do now?
Harry Lev was reviewing the recent sales report for Bamberger’s Department store in an effort to assess whether or not the newly implemented Wednesday evening late openings had had a positive overall effect on sales. Lev was under some pressure to demonstrate that the sales during the extended hours were more than covering the added cost to the store of the late opening, since he had been instrumental in initiating this change despite strong employee resistance. If he could not clear show a financial benefit, he could expect pressure to discontinue the experiment.
Starting with the spreadsheet data file (Bamberger.xlsx) prepare an analysis that can be used to assess the impact of the “Wednesday experiment”. In other words is there a real difference in the level of sales or has the hours expansion merely resulted in a redistribution of sales during the week? Within a hypothesis testing framework address the following:
1. Prior to the hour’s expansion were Wednesday sales different from the sales for other weekday’s sales (Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday)?
2. Prior to the hour’s expansion were Saturday sales different from the sales for weekdays (Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday)?
3. Following the hour’s expansion were Wednesday sales different from the sales for other weekday’s sales (Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday)?
4. Following the hour’s expansion were Saturday sales different from the sales for weekdays (Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday)?
5. When comparing the pre and post hour’s expansion period did Wednesday sales differ?
6. When comparing the pre and post hour’s expansion period did non-Wednesday weekday sales differ?
7. When comparing the pre and post hour’s expansion period did Saturday sales differ?
8. When comparing the pre and post hour’s expansion period weekly sales differ?
If the evidence supports expansion of sales estimate the magnitude of the increment in sales associated with Wednesday evening hours. The following questions and hints may be helpful. What implications would the change in sales have for income? To assist you Harry put together some weekly information from the pre-extended hour period. Sales average about $3.8 million per week. Since the cost of goods sold were 72% of sales, the gross margin was slightly more than $1 million per week. With operating expenses of $115,000 plus $14,500 for every hour of operation the Earnings before interest and taxes amounted to $167,000. After the 35% tax the resulting income was slightly over $100,000 (see below).
|
Average Weekly Data (for 54 hour week) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
3,801,000 |
Norman weekly sales |
|
Cost of Goods Sold |
2,736,000 |
at 72% of Sales |
|
Gross Margin |
1,065,000 |
|
|
Selling General & Administrative |
783,000 |
at 14,500 / hour of operation |
|
Depreciation |
115,000 |
fixed |
|
Earnings Before Interest & Taxes |
167,000 |
|
|
Taxes |
58,000 |
at 35% of EBIT |
|
Net Income |
109,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepare an analysis of the Wednesday experiment.
1. In analyzing the sales data what was the proper unit of analysis: hourly sales, daily sales, weekly sales?
2. What proportion of Wednesday’s increased sales represents a net increase as opposed to cannibalization from other days of the week? Was Harry justified in expanding the store’s Wednesday hours? What would you expect the quarterly report to show in terms of the impact on sales and income?
3. Should the store revert to a 54 hour Week? Should they consider opening a second evening?
4. Why?
The City of London was expropriating a portion of Sprinbank Drive as part
of a project to widen the road between Wharncliffe Road and Wonderland Road.
George Canning owner of Canning Consultants Inc., was retained by the City of
London to assess the resultant property value loss for the affected residents.
Canning had assembled a database of residential sales along with various
property attributes, and he now had to determine how to proceed in calculating
appropriate compensation for the "taking."
1. Compare Canning's multiple linear regression approach to this
problem with the more traditional sales comparison approach. Which one is more
appropriate?
2. Are there any concerns with using the attribute variables in
Canning's database as it is currently presented?
3. What first steps should be taken prior to developing the regression
model?
4. Develop a multiple regression model for calculating appropriate
compensation for the affected residents along Springbank Drive.
|
Week of |
Topic |
Reading Assignment |
Individual Homework |
Group Homework |
|
08 / 27 / 2007 |
Introduction |
ASW: Chapter 1 |
Information Sheet & Survey 2 |
- - - - - - - |
|
09 / 03 / 2007 |
Graphics: |
ASW: Chapter 2 |
- - - - - - - |
Lanco Catalogue
3 |
|
09 / 10 / 2007 |
Numerical: |
ASW: Chapter 3 |
- - - - - - - |
Rugged Client Part 1 |
|
09 / 17 / 2007 |
Probability |
ASW: Chapter 4 |
Homework 1 |
- - - - - - - |
|
09 / 24 / 2007 |
Probability & Distributions |
ASW: Chapter 5 |
- - - - - - - |
Rugged Client Part 2 |
|
10 / 01 / 2007 |
Distributions |
ASW: Chapter 6 |
Homework 2 |
- - - - - - - |
|
10 / 08 / 2007 |
Exam 1 |
Exam 1 |
- - - - - - - |
Amore Foods |
|
10 / 15 / 2007 |
Sampling Distributions |
ASW: Chapter 7 & 8 |
Homework 3 |
- - - - - - - |
|
10 / 22 / 2007 |
Interval Estimation |
ASW: Chapter 8 & 9 |
- - - - - - - |
Home Education Inc. |
|
10 / 29 / 2007 |
Hypothesis Testing |
ASW: Chapter 9 & 10 |
Homework 4 |
- - - - - - - |
|
11 / 05 / 2007 |
Exam 2 |
Exam 2 |
- - - - - - - |
The Sophomore Jinx |
|
11 / 12 / 2007 |
Linear Regression |
ASW: Chapter 14 |
- - - - - - - |
Alfonso's Department Store |
|
11 / 19 / 2007 |
Linear Regression |
ASW: Chapter 15 |
Homework 5 |
- - - - - - - |
|
11 / 26 / 2007 |
Multiple Regression |
ASW: Chapter 16 |
- - - - - - - |
Lansink Appraisals |
|
12 / 03 / 2007 |
Model Building |
Review |
Homework 6 |
- - - - - - - |
|
Notes: |
ASW: Statistics for Business and Economics, 10th
Anderson, David R., Sweeney, Dennis J., Williams, Thomas A. |
|||
|
|
All Topics &
Assignments are tentative and may be revised as needed |
|||
|
Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
|
8/26 |
8/27 |
8/28 |
8/29 |
8/30 |
8/31 |
9/1 |
|
|
1 |
|
Information
Sheet & Survey 2 |
|
|
|
|
9/2 |
9/3 |
9/4 |
9/5 |
9/6 |
9/7 |
9/8 |
|
|
Labor Day |
|
Lanco
Catalogue 3 |
|
|
|
|
9/9 |
9/10 |
9/11 |
9/12 |
9/13 |
9/14 |
9/15 |
|
|
4 |
|
5 |
Rosh
Hashanah |
Rugged
Client Part 1 |
|
|
9/16 |
9/17 |
9/18 |
9/19 |
9/20 |
9/21 |
9/22 |
|
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
Homework
1 |
YK |
|
9/23 |
9/24 |
9/25 |
9/26 |
9/27 |
9/28 |
9/29 |
|
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
9/30 |
10/1 |
10/2 |
10/3 |
10/4 |
10/5 |
10/6 |
|
|
10 |
Rugged
Client Part 2 |
11 |
|
Homework
2 |
|
|
10/7 |
10/8 |
10/9 |
10/10 |
10/11 |
10/12 |
10/13 |
|
|
Exam 1 12 |
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
10/14 |
10/15 |
10/16 |
10/17 |
10/18 |
10/19 |
10/20 |
|
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
Amore
Foods |
|
|
10/21 |
10/22 |
10/23 |
10/24 |
10/25 |
10/26 |
10/27 |
|
|
Homework
3 16 |
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
10/28 |
10/29 |
10/30 |
10/31 |
11/1 |
11/2 |
11/3 |
|
|
Home
Education Inc. 18 |
|
19 |
|
Homework
4 |
|
|
11/4 |
11/5 |
11/6 |
11/7 |
11/8 |
11/9 |
11/10 |
|
|
Exam 2 20 |
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
11/11 |
11/12 |
11/13 |
11/14 |
11/15 |
11/16 |
11/17 |
|
|
Bamberger’s
Department Store 22 |
|
23 |
|
Alfonso's
Department Store |
|
|
11/18 |
11/19 |
11/20 |
11/21 |
11/22 |
11/23 |
11/24 |
|
|
24 |
Homework
5 |
Fall
Recess |
Fall
Recess |
Fall
Recess |
|
|
11/25 |
11/26 |
11/27 |
11/28 |
11/29 |
11/30 |
12/1 |
|
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
Homework
6a |
|
|
12/2 |
12/3 |
12/4 |
12/5 |
12/6 |
12/7 |
12/8 |
|
|
Springbank
Drive 27 |
|
Homework
6b 28 |
|
|
|
|
Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |